Hepp et al v. Ultra Green Energy Services LLC
Plaintiff: Curt Hepp and Al Pollard
Defendant: Ultra Green Energy Services LLC
Third_party_defendant: Cathy W. Pierce and Robert J. Pierce
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Ultra Green Energy Services LLC
Case Number: 1:2013cv04692
Filed: June 27, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Thomas M. Durkin
Nature of Suit: Contract: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 189 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, Ultra Green's motion to alter judgment 165 is denied. The judgment stands. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 3/18/2016:Mailed notice(srn, )
August 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 144 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies Ultra Green's motion to dismiss Count III of Hepp's second amended complaint, 136 . Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 8/4/2015:Mailed notice(srn, )
April 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 127 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order:For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies Hepp's motion for summary judgment 107 . Status hearing set for 5/6/2015 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 4/28/2015:Mailed notice(srn, )
December 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 95 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order:For the reasons previously stated, the 12(c) portion of the Pierce Defendantsmotion to dismiss, R. 84, is denied without prejudice. Because the Court maintains jurisdiction of Counts I, II, X, XI, and XVI of Ultra Greens third party complaint, the 12(b)(1) portion of the Pierce Defendants motion to dismiss, R. 84, is also denied without prejudice. Alternatively, neither party has requested that the Court convert the instant motion to one for summary judgment. If the parties would like the Court to do so in light of the above ruling, then they may so move. This way, both Parties will have notice of the relevant standard of review and have the opportunity to submit additional evidentiary material of their own. Truhlar, 2007 WL 1030237, at *6 (citing Venture, 987 F.2d at 431). Status hearing set for 1/8/2015 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 12/17/2014:Mailed notice(srn, )
December 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 94 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order:The Court concludes that Ultra Green's counterclaim is barred by the statute of limitations provided in 5/28-8(b), and is not entitled to the benefit of 5/13-207. As such, Hepp's motion to dismiss Ultra Green's counterclaim 79 , is granted, and Ultra Green's counterclaim is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 12/12/2014:Mailed notice(srn, )
May 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Ultra Green's motion to dismiss Hepp's amended complaint, [54, 55], is denied. The parties are directed to appear at the previously-scheduled status hearing set for 6/4/2014 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 5/22/2014:Mailed notice(srn, )
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MOTION by Defendant Ultra Green Energy Services LLC for judgment , MOTION by Defendant Ultra Green Energy Services LLC to dismiss the Captioned Complaint in its Entirety (Samuels, Elliot)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hepp et al v. Ultra Green Energy Services LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Curt Hepp
Represented By: Todd Lawrence McLawhorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Al Pollard
Represented By: Todd Lawrence McLawhorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ultra Green Energy Services LLC
Represented By: Chuck Richard Pardue
Represented By: Elliot M. Samuels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Third_party_defendant: Cathy W. Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Third_party_defendant: Robert J. Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Ultra Green Energy Services LLC
Represented By: Chuck Richard Pardue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?