Nesbitt v. Regas et al
| Diane Goldring Nesbitt |
| James Regas, Christian Nesbitt, Regas, Frezados & Dallas, LLP, Peter Regas, Peter G Frezados, William D Dallas, Suzanne Regas, Allyson Regas, Jerry F Miceli, Adams Appraisal Corp. and Douglas Adams |
| 1:2013cv08245 |
| November 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Ronald A. Guzman |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion, the motions by Allyson Regas 27 and Regas, Frezados & Dallas, LLP 32 are granted, and both Count I and Count II are dismissed against these movants without prejudice. Suzanne Regas's motion 73 is denied with respect to quashing service, but granted in part with respect to dismissing Count I against Suzanne Regas without prejudice. The motions by James Regas 25 and Adams Valuation Corp. 30 are granted i n part, with respect to dismissing Count I without prejudice, and denied in part, with respect to Count II. Goldring's motion for default judgment 68 is denied as moot. Goldring is granted leave to file an amended complaint that addresses the deficiencies identified in the Memorandum Opinion. The status hearing remains set for 4/1/2015 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 3/20/2015. [For further details see order] Mailed notice(air, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
