Friedman v. City of Highland Park
Plaintiff: Arie S Friedman
Defendant: City of Highland Park
Case Number: 1:2013cv09073
Filed: December 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: John W. Darrah
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Entered by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 9/18/2014. Mailed notice (tlm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Friedman v. City of Highland Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Highland Park
Represented By: Steven M. Elrod
Represented By: Christopher James Murdoch
Represented By: Hart M. Passman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arie S Friedman
Represented By: Brett Michael Henne
Represented By: Andrew Arthur Lothson
Represented By: James Brian Vogts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?