Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. et al v. Atturo Tire Corporation et al.
| Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. and Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. |
| Atturo Tire Corporation, Svizz-One Corporation Ltd., Vittore Wheel & Tire and RTM Wheel & Tire |
| 1:2014cv00206 |
| January 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX Outside US |
| John Z. Lee |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
760
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Toyo's motion for judgment or alternatively a new trial 751 is granted in part and denied in part and Atturo's motion for injunctive relief and other corrective actions 753 is denied. Judgment shall enter in Toyo's favor on Atturo's Count I (tortious interference with contract), Count III (defamation), Count VI (IDTPA) and Count VII (Lanham Act). Judgment shall enter in Atturo's favor on Atturo's Count II (tortious interference wi th prospective business expectancy), Count IV (unfair competition), and Count V (unjust enrichment). Accordingly, judgment shall enter in favor of Atturo Tire Corporation and against Toyo Tire Corporation and Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. in the amount of $10,000,000 in compensatory damages and $100,000 in punitive damages. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 5/10/2022. (See attached Order for further detail.)Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing
751
MOTION by Counter Defendants Toyo Tire Corporation, Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. for judgment Toyo's Motion for Judgment or, Alternatively, a New Trial (Lowrie, Matthew)
|
|
Filing
690
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Atturo's Daubert motion as to Shatzer 414 and Toyo's Daubert motion as to Stevens 418 are granted in part, denied in part and taken under advisement in part. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 8/26/2021. (See attached Order for further details.)Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing
687
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order : Toyo's Daubert motion as to Atturo expert Brian Daniel 415 is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 8/25/2021. (See attached Order for further detail.)Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing
674
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Toyo's motion for entry of final judgment 666 is denied. Jury trial remains set for the week of September 13, 2021. Final pretrial conference set for August 30, 2021 remains set and along with other deadlines set by the Court (see Dkt. 664). Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 5/10/2021. (See attached Order for further detail.) Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing
661
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion and Order, Atturo's motion for summary judgment 619 is granted. Toyo's Count II (Lanham Act) and Count VI (IDTPA) are dismissed with prejudice. Judgment is ent ered in favor of both Defendant Atturo Tire Corporation and Defendant Svizz-One Corporation Ltd. and against Plaintiffs Toyo Tire Corporation and Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corporation on Counts II and VI. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 2/9/21. (For further detail see attached order.) Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing
625
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion and Order, Atturo's petition for fees 518 is granted in part. The Court orders Toyo to pay $103,239 to Atturo. The amount should be paid by September 30, 2020. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 9/2/2020. Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing
564
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the Order, Atturo's motion to exclude expert opinions of Toyo expert Michael Rappeport 405 is granted; motion as to Larry Chiagouris 411 is granted; and motion as to Charles Patrick [4 13] is granted. Toyo's Daubert motion as to Atturo expert Aric Rindfleisch 416 is granted in part and denied in part; motion as to Jeffrey Stec 417 is denied in large part; and motion as to Joseph Walter 419 is denied. Status hearing is se t for January 28, 2020 at 9:00am. Parties are to exhaust all settlement options prior to that date and be prepared to report on the status of settlement discussions. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 12/20/2019. (See Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details.)Mailed notice. (dm, )
|
|
Filing
502
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 7/23/18.Mailed notice(ca, )
|
|
Filing
362
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 3/30/17.Mailed notice(ca, )
|
|
Filing
334
ORDER: The Court denies the Motion to Compel Production of Documents Concerning Non-Privileged Settlement Discussions 303 filed by Defendant Atturo Tire Corporation ("Atturo"). The Court denies the motion with prejudice to the extent it s eeks the production of the documents listed in Exhibit A to Atturo's motion. The Court denies the motion without prejudice to the extent it seeks Atturo's attorneys' fees and costs. [For more details see order] - Signed by the Honorable Susan E. Cox on 6/3/2016. Mailed notice (np, )
|
|
Filing
326
ORDER: After granting Atturo's motion to compel, Magistrate Judge Cox issued a Report and Recommendation 273 proposing sanction against Toyo Tire. For the reasons stated below, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation and overrules Toyo Tires' objections. Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 5/3/16. [For further details see order.]Mailed notice(ca, )
|
|
Filing
266
ORDER: Atturo's motion to preclude Toyo from present advertising evidence 194 is denied. [For further details see order] - Signed by the Honorable Susan E. Cox on 11/20/2015. Mailed notice (np, )
|
|
Filing
228
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's motion to compel additional discovery on Toyo's Multiple OPMT Patterns 191 . For the reasons stated in the order, we grant defendant's motion. [For further details see order] - Signed by the Honorable Susan E. Cox on 9/22/2015. Mailed notice (np, )
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER: Atturo Tire Corporation and Toyo Tire & Rubber Corporation have confirmed that they will certify their document production is complete on or before February 27, 2015. Svizz-One Corporation confirms that it will certify that all documents have been produced to Toyo on or before March 6, 2015. The Court reiterates its previous ruling that Masaaki Ohara's deposition is to take place in Chicago at a mutually agreed time and place. Regarding Messrs. Dayton and Puente, plaintiff is to eith er produce these witnesses in California or file a motion on or before February 27, 2015 stating the factual basis for its assertion that these individuals are not managing agents, as outlined in the attached Order. Plaintiff is also ordered to prope rly respond to Atturo's interrogatories and produce existing English versions or translations of the foreign documents already produced on or before March 5, 2015. Status hearing set for 2/25/2015 at 9:30 a.m. is hereby stricken. [For further details see order.] - Signed by the Honorable Susan E. Cox on 2/24/2015. Mailed notice (np, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
