G&G Closed-Circuit Events, LLC. v. Castillo et al
| G&G Closed-Circuit Events, LLC. |
| Jaime F. Castillo, Maria A. Castillo and El Bajio Enterprises, Inc. |
| 1:2014cv02073 |
| March 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Joan B. Gottschall |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
438
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, on consideration of the motion 425 for costs and the motion 426 for fees, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(B)(iii), the Court awards G&G $31,583.00 in reasonable attorneys' fees and $2,587.10 in taxable costs, for a total of $34,170.10. The tracking status hearing of 12/11 2020 is vacated. Emailed notice (mw, )
|
|
Filing
423
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, the Court denies Plaintiffs' motions for judgment as a matter of law and a new trial 398 417 . The Court awards Plaintiff $800 in statutory damages under 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(iii). Plaintiff's Rule 50(a) motion 402 is terminate as moot because Plaintiff prevailed on the jury verdict. The filing at R. 401 appears to be a mistaken filing by Plaintiff of a motio n filed by the defense, so R. 401 is terminated. A separate AO-450 final judgment shall be entered. The status hearing of 09/26/2019 is vacated. The parties shall follow Local Rule 54.3 in litigating attorneys' fees and costs, with a motion noticed for presentment when they reach the step at Local Rule 54.3(f). Civil case terminated.Emailed notice(slb, )
|
|
Filing
402
MOTION by Plaintiff G&G Closed-Circuit Events, LLC. for judgment Rule 50(a) (Samovalov, Boris)
|
|
Filing
398
MOTION by Defendants Jaime F. Castillo, Maria A. Castillo, El Bajio Enterprises, Inc. for judgment Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a) (Clay, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
350
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, Plaintiff G&G's summary judgment motion 304 is denied; Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant G&G's motion 293 to dismiss is granted; Thir d-Party Defendant Riley's motion 300 to dismiss is granted; and Defendants' summary judgment motion 295 is denied. The counterclaim (already on its third iteration) is dismissed with prejudice. Additionally, Defendants' motion [337 ] to take judicial notice, construed as a motion to file supplemental authority, is granted. Plaintiff's motion 341 347 to file check under seal is granted, but a public version redacting financial-account numbers and the amount must be file d by 06/28/2018. Defendants' motion 344 to file reply on the supplemental authority issue is denied as unnecessary. In order to give G&G and Defendants enough time to review this Opinion and re-evaluate their settlement positions, the status hearing of 06/21/2018 is reset to 07/09/2018 at 10:15 a.m. Mailed notice (mw, )
|
|
Filing
269
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 3/22/2017. Mailed notice(mjc, )
|
|
Filing
213
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey Cole on 6/30/2016:Mailed notice(jms, )
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 3/5/2015. Mailed notice(mjc, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
