Strickland v. Village of RIchton Park et al
| Cynthia Lynn Strickland |
| Village of Richton Park and Elvira P Williams Yancey |
| 1:2014cv02741 |
| April 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Charles R. Norgle |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. The Court grants in part and denies in part defendants' motion to dismiss 60 and: (1) dismisses with prejudice the Count II ADEA claim and any § 1983 age discrimination claim plaintiff may have attempted to a ssert; (2) dismisses without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies any Title VII or ADA retaliation claims plaintiff may have attempted to assert; and (3) dismisses without prejudice to amendment any § 1981 retaliation claims against the Village and Chief Williams and any § 1983 race discrimination claim against the Village that plaintiff may have attempted to assert. The § 1983 race discrimination claim against Chief Williams based on the unequal assignment of extra hours stands. Plaintiff has until September 9, 2015, her final opportunity, to amend the §§ 1981 and 1983 race discrimination claims in accordance with this Order. If she fails to do so by that date, the Court will dismiss those claims with prejudice. [For further details see order.] Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 8/26/2015. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. The Court grants in part, denies in part, and strikes as moot in part defendants' motion to dismiss 22 . The motion is: (1) granted as to any Title VII, ADA, and ADEA claims plaintiff asserts against the police chi ef in her individual capacity, which are dismissed with prejudice, and the §§ 1981 and 1983 claims plaintiff asserts against the Village, which are dismissed without prejudice; (2) denied as to the §§ 1981 and 1983 claims plaintif f asserts against the police chief in her individual capacity; and (3) stricken as moot as to the purported punitive damages claims plaintiff asserts against the Village. Plaintiff has fourteen days from the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to amend the §§ 1981 and 1983 claims she asserts against the Village, if she can do so and comply with Rule 11. If she fails to do so, the Court will dismiss those claims with prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 5/6/2015. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
