Weiler v. Village of Oak Lawn et al
| Chad Weiler |
| Village of Oak Lawn and Larry Deetjen |
| 1:2014cv04991 |
| July 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Matthew F. Kennelly |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. the Court grants defendants' motion for summary judgment in part and denies it without prejudice in part 87 The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing with prejudice Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 12 of plaintiff's second amended complaint and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction Counts 9, 10, and 11 of plaintiff's second amended complaint. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 2/2/2016: Mailed notice (am)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 3/31/2015: For the reasons stated in the accompanying decision, the Court grants defendants' motion to dismiss in part and denies it in part [dkt. no. 14]. The Court d ismisses the federal claims against Deetjen in his individual capacity (counts 1, 3, 5, and 7), along with the First Amendment association and equal protection claims against the Village (counts 4 and 6). The Court declines to dismiss Weiler's state law claims (counts 9 and 10), and the Village has not sought dismissal of counts 2, 8, and 11. (mk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
