Hunter et al v. PepsiCo Inc. et al
D W Hunter and Larnell Evans, Jr. |
PepsiCo Inc., Quaker Oats Company, The, Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC, Hillshire Brands Company, John Does and Janet Lynn Silverberg |
1:2014cv06011 |
August 5, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Edmond E. Chang |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 44 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 MOTION and Request Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 1005, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.3(a)(4), 12.3(5)(b)(1)(A)(c)(d) to Issue an Order Upon the Deputy Commissioner of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to Not Destroy Any Evidence For Any Aunt Jemima Trademarks; (Exhibits). (sxw) |
Filing 40 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The motion of the PepsiCo Defendants (namely, PepsiCo, Inc., The Quaker Oats Company, and Janet Lynn Silverberg) to extend time to answer or respond 37 is granted to 10/27/2014. Emailed notice (slb, ) |
Filing 39 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC (Fox, Deirdre) |
Filing 42 MEMORANDUM in Support of Objection 41 by D W Hunter. (sxw) |
Filing 41 OBJECTION by D W Hunter to MOTION by Defendants PepsiCo Inc., Quaker Oats Company, The, Janet Lynn Silverberg for extension of time 37 ; (Exhibits) (sxw) |
Filing 38 NOTICE of Motion by Dean Nicholas Panos for presentment of extension of time 37 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 9/24/2014 at 09:30 AM. (Panos, Dean) |
Filing 37 MOTION by Defendants PepsiCo Inc., Quaker Oats Company, The, Janet Lynn Silverberg for extension of time (Panos, Dean) |
Filing 36 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Defendant Pinnacle Foods' extension motion 32 to answer or respond is granted to 10/27/2014, over Plantiffs' objection, in light of the length of the complaint. Plaintiffs' motion for "judicial notice" of violation of 15 U.S.C. 1041 34 is denied. It does not appear that there is such a section in the United States Code. The motion also refers to 18 U.S.C. 1512, but that statute defines a criminal offense, and does not provide for relief in a civil case. The substance of the motion otherwise appears to present some service of process or discovery disputes, but neither issue is presented in a way that seeks proper relief, such as a motion to find that service was effectuated. The motion is denied. Emailed and mailed notice (slb, ) |
Filing 33 NOTICE of Motion by Deirdre Anne Fox for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer 32 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 9/22/2014 at 08:30 AM. (Fox, Deirdre) |
Filing 32 MOTION by Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC for extension of time to file answer or Otherwise Respond (Fox, Deirdre) |
Filing 31 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC by Deirdre Anne Fox (Fox, Deirdre) |
Filing 30 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC by Stephanie Ann Scharf (Scharf, Stephanie) |
Filing 35 AFFIDAVIT of Dannez Hunter in support of motion for judicial notice for violation of 15 U.S.C. 1041(B) 34 . (gcy, ) |
Filing 34 MOTION by Plaintiff D W Hunter for Judicial Notice For Violation of 15 U.S.C. 1041(B). (gcy, ) |
Filing 29 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Defendant Hillshire Brands' extension motion 24 to answer or respond to the complaint is granted to 10/27/2014, over Plaintiffs' objection. The extension is warranted in light of the 100+ page complaint (with exhibits), R. 1, and the number of claims asserted. Status hearing of 09/26/2014 is reset to 10/28/2014 at 8:30 a.m., and the joint initial status report is due three business days before the new status hearing. Emailed and mailed notice (slb, ) |
Filing 28 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Plaintiffs' motions for sanctions [3, 16] are denied. From what can be discerned from the motions, Plaintiffs seek sanctions for filings or positions not taken in this litigation, and Rule 11 sanctions are not available for representations not made to the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). The Court understands that Plaintiffs are pursuing the case pro se and without legal representation, but they are warned that the filing of frivolous sanctions motions can in turn result in the imposition of sanctions on the movants. Emailed and mailed notice (slb, ) |
Filing 27 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Janet Lynn Silverberg by Jason Michael Bradford (Bradford, Jason) |
Filing 26 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Janet Lynn Silverberg by Dean Nicholas Panos (Panos, Dean) |
Filing 25 NOTICE of Motion by John I. Grossbart for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer, motion for relief 24 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 9/17/2014 at 08:30 AM. (Grossbart, John) |
Filing 24 MOTION by Defendant Hillshire Brands Company for extension of time to file answer regarding amended complaint 15 (Grossbart, John) |
Filing 23 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Hillshire Brands Company (Grossbart, John) |
Filing 22 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Hillshire Brands Company by Aimee Elizabeth Graham (Graham, Aimee) |
Filing 21 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Hillshire Brands Company by John I. Grossbart (Grossbart, John) |
Filing 20 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by PepsiCo Inc., Quaker Oats Company, The (Panos, Dean) |
Filing 19 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants PepsiCo Inc., Quaker Oats Company, The by Dean Nicholas Panos (Panos, Dean) |
Filing 18 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants PepsiCo Inc., Quaker Oats Company, The by Jason Michael Bradford (Bradford, Jason) |
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in support of motion and request for Rule 11 Sanctions by Plaintiff. (gcy, ) |
Filing 16 MOTION and Request for Rule 11 sanctions by Plaintiffs Larnell Evans, Jr, D W Hunter. (gcy, ) |
Filing 15 AMENDED complaint by Larnell Evans, Jr, D W Hunter against Hillshire Brands Company, PepsiCo Inc., Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC, Quaker Oats Company, The, Janet Lynn Silverberg, John Does.(gcy, ) |
Filing 14 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (gcy, ) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to The Quaker Oats Company, c/o CT Corporation System on 9/4/2014, answer due 9/25/2014. (gcy, ) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Hillshire Brands Company c/o CT Corporation System on 9/4/2014, answer due 9/25/2014. (gcy, ) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Pinnacle Foods Group,LLC c/o CT Corporation on 9/4/2014, answer due 9/25/2014. (gcy, ) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to PepsiCo Inc. c/o CT Corporation System on 9/4/2014, answer due 9/25/2014. (gcy, ) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Issued1 original and 1 copy as to Janet Lynn Silverberg. (gcy, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant PepsiCo Inc. (daj, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Hillshire Brands Company, Pinnacle Foods Group, LLC, Quaker Oats Company, The (daj, ) |
Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Status hearing set for 09/26/2014 at 8:30 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. Additionally, the parties must read Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures on the Court's website; those Procedures are considered standing orders in this case. Mailed notice (Attachments: # 1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
Filing 7 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang for all further proceedings. Entered by Executive Committee on 8/11/14.(gcy, ) |
Filing 5 MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (sxw, ) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM by D W Hunter in support of motion for sanctions 3 . (sxw, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff D W Hunter for sanctions; (Exhibits) (sxw, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (sxw, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by D W Hunter; Jury Demand; (Exhibits).(sxw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.