Beilfuss v. Fontana Builders, Inc. et al
Barbara J Beilfuss |
Elsa Theile Fuchs and Fontant Builders, Inc. |
Bill Randle |
Bill Randle |
Bill Randle |
First American Title Insurance Company |
First American Title Insurance Company |
Cherita Logan and Bruce Nash |
1:2014cv06159 |
August 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Milton I. Shadur |
All Other Real Property |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM ORDER. It has been crystal-clear for more than two centuries (see Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267 (1806)) that such common citizenship between any party on one side of the "v." and any party on the other side of t hat symbol defeats diversity. Moreover, if diversity were present, Section 1441(b)(2) would preclude removal in the diversity case because of defendant Randle's Illinois citizenship. All of that being true, Section 1447(c) mandates the remand of this case to its place of origin in the Circuit Court of Cook County, and this Court so orders. To implement the remand and enable the parties to go forward with the litigation promptly, the Clerk of Court is ordered to mail the certified copy of the remand order to the Clerk of the Circuit Court forthwith. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 8/14/2014. Mailed notice(tlp, ) Modified by the Clerk's Office on 8/15/2014 (rm, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.