St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company v. Amy et al
| St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company |
| Drextel Amy, James Bringley, Olga V Lakes-Battle, Eric Rader, Thurman Smith and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
| 1:2014cv06202 |
| August 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Manish S. Shah |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 6/18/2015: Plaintiff's motion to quash expert discovery 79 is denied. The court finds, however, that FDIC-R's expert disclosure is untimely. The discovery and briefing schedule on the s ummary judgment motion remains as previously set. However, because of FDIC-R's untimely disclosure, Travelers may depose FDIC-R's expert any time prior to 7/31/15. FDIC-R shall bear the cost of the expert's deposition transcript for Travelers's use in its reply in support of its summary judgment motion. In addition, Travelers may submit a rebuttal expert report in connection with its reply, but FDIC-R will not be permitted to depose Travelers's expert (nor will FDIC-R be permitted any sur-reply in the event Travelers offers expert evidence in its summary judgment reply). [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (psm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
