Roberson et al v. Village Of Sauk Village et al
Phoebe Roberson, C.H., T'era Hopkins and Ch.H. |
Village Of Sauk Village, University Of Chicago, DCFS, Grossman, Unknown Officers, Jill Glick, Debra Robinson and DCFS Supervisors |
1:2014cv08174 |
October 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Virginia M. Kendall |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. The Court grants the motion to dismiss of Glick and U of C 20 and dismisses without prejudice the claims plaintiffs assert against them. The Court also grants the motion to dismiss of DCFS and Robinson 55 and (1) dis misses with prejudice the claims asserted against DCFS in Counts I-IV, VIII, and IX and dismisses without prejudice the claims asserted against it in Counts VI and VII; and (2) dismisses with prejudice the claims asserted against Robinson in Counts I I, IV, VI and VII and dismisses without prejudice the claims asserted against her in Counts I, III and IX. Plaintiffs have until August 10, 2015 to amend their claims against Glick and U of C andCounts I and IX against Robinson, and only those claims, if they can do so and comply with Rule 11. If plaintiffs fail to do so, the Court will dismiss those claims and this suit with prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 7/28/2015. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.