Suppressed v. Suppressed
| Suppressed |
| Suppressed |
| 1:2014cv09412 |
| November 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Ruben Castillo |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
543
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated herein, Relator's Motion to Amend Judgment (Dkt. No. 495) is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted insofar as the Court orders damages to be trebled, post-judgment int erest on all claims, and prejudgment interest on the Texas and Louisiana claims. The Court denies the Motion as to prejudgment interest on all other state and District of Columbia claims and on federal FCA claims. The Court orders civil penalties for all violations at 20% above the relevant statutory minimums. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 5/9/2023: Mailed notice (maf) (Main Document 543 replaced on 5/9/2023) (maf, ).
|
|
Filing
541
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated herein, the Post-Trial Motions of Defendant Eli Lilly and Company are denied with exception to the award of damages to Colorado, Georgia, New Jersey, Oklahoma, and Rhode Island. If the Relator refuses to agree to the Remittitur, the Court will order a new trial as to the issue of damages as to these five (5) states. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 4/26/2023: Mailed notice (maf)
|
|
Filing
499
MOTION by Defendant Eli Lilly and Company for judgment as a matter of law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b), MOTION by Defendant Eli Lilly and Company for new trial under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 (Watral, Diana)
|
|
Filing
483
MOTION by Plaintiff Ronald J Streck for judgment Relator's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(a) (Miller, Daniel)
|
|
Filing
374
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated herein, the Court rules as follows: 1. Denies Defendant Eli Lilly's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 314); 2. Denies in part and grants in part Relator's Motion for Summary Judgement (Dkt. No. 311); and 3. Grants in part and denies in part the Motions to Exclude Expert Opinions and Testimony. (Dkt. Nos. 293, 295, 297, 299, 301.) Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 2/28/2022:Mailed notice (maf)
|
|
Filing
122
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) Motions to Dismiss are denied. Defendants to answer by 4/25/19. Status hearing set for 5/2/19 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 4/3/19: Mailed notice(maf) (Main Document 122 replaced on 4/3/2019) (maf, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Suppressed v. Suppressed | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Suppressed | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Suppressed | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
