Milsap v. Habitat Company et al
| Ora D Milsap |
| Habitat Company and Chicago Housing Authority |
| 1:2015cv00630 |
| January 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Thomas M. Durkin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Defendants' motions to dismiss 41 53 55 are therefore granted. The Second Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Though the Court strongly doubts that the deficiencies identified in this Order can b e cured, it grants Plaintiff leave to file a motion to amend the complaint by January 6, 2017. The motion should attach a proposed amended complaint and a brief of no more than five pages explaining how the proposed amendments cure the deficiencies i n the current complaint. Defendants should not file a brief responding to Plaintiff's motion to amend (should she choose to file one) unless the Court requests a response. If Plaintiff does not file a motion to amend by January 6, 2017, her case will be dismissed with prejudice. Status hearing held on 11/29/2016. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 11/29/2016:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
