Brown v. Duvall et al
| David Brown |
| Kim Duvall, Tarry Williams and Salvador Godinez |
| 1:2015cv01672 |
| February 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Will |
| Manish S. Shah |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 6/3/2016: Defendants' motion for summary judgment, 27 , is denied. A status hearing is set for 6/15/16 at 10:30 a.m. Defendants are directed to make arrangements for plaintiff to be available by telephone for the status hearing on 6/15/16. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (psm, )
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 3/1/2016: Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation 32 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time 33 to respond to Defendants' motion for summary j udgment is granted. The briefing schedule on Defendants' motion for summary judgment is modified as follows: Plaintiff's response to Defendant's motion for summary judgment is due April 18, 2016. Defendants' reply is due May 9, 2016. [For further detail see attached order.] Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (psm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
