Daniel v. Dennison
Ashton Daniel |
People of The State of Illinois and Jeff Dennison |
1:2018cv05685 |
August 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Andrea R Wood |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Respondent Jeff Dennison by Eric Michael Levin (Levin, Eric) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Respondent shall answer or otherwise respond to the habeas corpus petition #1 by 11/2/2018. Petitioner may file a reply by 11/26/2018. Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is stricken as moot. Petitioner's motion for attorney representation #4 is denied without prejudice. The Clerk is instructed to: (1) terminate Respondent People of the State of Illinois; (2) add Jeff Dennison, Warden, Shawnee Correctional Center as Respondent; and (3) alter the case caption to Daniel v. Dennison. Signed by the Honorable Andrea R. Wood on 10/5/2018. Mailed notice. (pk, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION by Petitioner Ashton Daniel for attorney representation. (kp, ) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION by Petitioner Ashton Daniel for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Exhibits). (kp, ) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (kp, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus and no copies filed by Ashton Daniel against People of The State of Illinois (Exhibits). (Attachments: #1 Envelope postmarked 8/08/18)(kp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.