Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Patel
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for The National Republic Bank of Chicago and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
| Hiren Patel |
| 1:2019cv06917 |
| October 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert M Dow |
| Banks and Banking |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 1821 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for The National Republic Bank of Chicago by Monica Maria Tynan (Tynan, Monica)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION by Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for The National Republic Bank of Chicagoto admit pro hac vice (US Plaintiff) (Tonkinson, Stuart)
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for The National Republic Bank of Chicago by Stuart Tonkinson (Tonkinson, Stuart)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Tonkinson, Stuart)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for The National Republic Bank of Chicago; (Tonkinson, Stuart)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (yt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
