Sharrieff v. Red Roof Inn-Plus et al
| Sharrieff and Yashua Sharrieff |
| Red Roof Inn-Plus and Tasha Clark |
| 1:2020cv01781 |
| March 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Virginia M Kendall |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 5/4/2020. Plaintiffs' Motion for attorney representation #5 is denied without prejudice. See Order for further details. Mailed notice(lk, )
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER Third Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on April 24, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Third Amended General Order. Parties are must carefully review all obligations under this Order, including the requirement listed in paragraph number 5 to file a joint written status report in most civil cases. See attached Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 4/24/2020: Mailed notice. (docket9, )
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 4/6/2020. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #5 is denied. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed, he must pay the $400 filing fee and file an amended complaint setting forth the separate allegations as required. Plaintiff's complaint to the extent it is based on Title VII is allowed to proceed. However, if Plaintiff wishes to bring separate counts for discrimination, harassment, unfair treatment, and wrongful termination, he must file an Amended Complaint that complies with Rule 8 and cures the deficiencies identified by this Court on or before 6/1/2020. This extended time takes into account the Court's time exclusion for Covid-19 and therefore it is not to be extended without a motion for good cause to do so. See Order for further details. Mailed notice(lk, )
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER CORRECTED ENTRY: ORDER Seconded Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 30, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Second Amended General Order. Amended General Order 20-0012, entered on March 17, 2020, and General Order 20-0014, entered on March 20, 2020, are vacated and superseded by this Second Amended General. See attached Order for guidance. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/30/2020: Mailed notice...Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/30/2020:Mailed notice(docket7, )
|
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial status hearing set for 5/21/2020 at 9:00 a.m. Joint Status Report due by 5/18/2020. The parties are directed to Judge Kendall's web page found at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov for information about the Initial Status Report and for information regarding all standing orders for cases on Judge Kendall's docket. The parties shall follow all of the standing orders for Judge Kendall and all Local Rules which can be found at the same web page. For the Initial Status Report, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; 3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER Seconded Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 30, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Second Amended General Order. Amended General Order 20-0012, entered on March 17, 2020, and General Order 20-0014, entered on March 20, 2020, are vacated and superseded by this Second Amended General. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/23/2020: Mailed notice. (docket7, )
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jh, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Yashua Sharrieff for attorney representation. (jh, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Yashua Sharrieff for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (jh, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Yashua Sharrieff. (jh, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jh, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint by Yashua Sharrieff. (Exhibits) (jh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
