Whitmer v. CitiMortgage Inc.

Whitmer v. CitiMortgage Inc.

Plaintiff:	Michelle Whitmer
Defendant:	CitiMortgage Inc.
Case Number:	3:2012cv50115
Filed:	April 4, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Rockford Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Frederick J. Kapala
Presiding Judge:	P. Michael Mahoney
Nature of Suit:	Other Fraud
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 20, 2015	Filing 95 ORDER/WRITTEN Opinion signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 5/20/2015: For the reasons stated below, defendant's motion 88 to dismiss Counts V, VI, and VII of plaintiff's complaint is denied. The parties are urged to contact Magistrate Judge Johnston to make another attempt to settle this case. (See attached Statement-Opinion) Mailed notice (ngm, )
December 21, 2012	Filing 32 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 12/21/2012: For the reasons stated below, defendant's motion to dismiss 9 is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted as to the claims in Count III and Coun t IV and the request for punitive damages set forth in Count V. These counts are dismissed with prejudice. The motion is denied as to the claims in Count I and Count II. The court requires the parties to report to Magistrate Judge Mahoney within 30 days as to whether they wish to engage in mediation/settlement with Magistrate Judge Mahoney.[For further details see order.] Electronic notice(jat, )

Date Filed

Document Text

May 20, 2015

Filing 95 ORDER/WRITTEN Opinion signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 5/20/2015: For the reasons stated below, defendant's motion 88 to dismiss Counts V, VI, and VII of plaintiff's complaint is denied. The parties are urged to contact Magistrate Judge Johnston to make another attempt to settle this case. (See attached Statement-Opinion) Mailed notice (ngm, )

December 21, 2012

Filing 32 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 12/21/2012: For the reasons stated below, defendant's motion to dismiss 9 is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted as to the claims in Count III and Coun t IV and the request for punitive damages set forth in Count V. These counts are dismissed with prejudice. The motion is denied as to the claims in Count I and Count II. The court requires the parties to report to Magistrate Judge Mahoney within 30 days as to whether they wish to engage in mediation/settlement with Magistrate Judge Mahoney.[For further details see order.] Electronic notice(jat, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitmer v. CitiMortgage Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Whitmer
Represented By:	Charles E. Cronauer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: CitiMortgage Inc.
Represented By:	Scott P. Clair
Represented By:	Sara Ann Eber
Represented By:	Todd A. Rowden
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?