Nautilus Insurance Company v. Front Range Environmental , LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Northern District Nautilus Insurance Company v. Front Range Environmental , LLC

Nautilus Insurance Company v. Front Range Environmental , LLC

Plaintiff:	Nautilus Insurance Company
Defendant:	Front Range Environmental , LLC
Case Number:	3:2014cv50083
Filed:	April 21, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Rockford Office
County:	McHenry
Presiding Judge:	Iain D. Johnston
Presiding Judge:	Philip G. Reinhard
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 5, 2014	Filing 22 ORDER signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 9/5/2014: On 8/6/2014, Magistrate Judge Johnston entered a report and recommendation 19 that plaintiff's motion 16 for default judgment be granted. No objections were filed but plaintiff filed a document 20 it characterized as a "response" to the report and recommendation in which it asked the court to accept the report and recommendation but also asked that the court find additional grounds for entry of the default judg ment beyond those set forth in the report and recommendation. The court struck this document and granted plaintiff until 9/3/2014 to file a motion with Magistrate Judge Johnston asking him to withdraw the report and recommendation and to seek entr y of a new one if plaintiff so desired. The court stated that if no such motion was filed within the time allowed, the court would accept the report and recommendation 19 on file and enter the default judgment as recommended by Magistrate Judge J ohnston as no timely objection to the report and recommendation had been filed. Plaintiff has not filed such a motion with the magistrate judge. The court has reviewed the record and accepts the report and recommendation. Plaintiffs motion 16 fo r default judgment is granted. Default judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant declaring that plaintiff has no duty to defend defendant in the state court case Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Front Range Environmental et al., Case No. 2013 CV 32289, pending in Jefferson County, Colorado District Court. Mailed notice (ngm, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 5, 2014

Filing 22 ORDER signed by the Honorable Philip G. Reinhard on 9/5/2014: On 8/6/2014, Magistrate Judge Johnston entered a report and recommendation 19 that plaintiff's motion 16 for default judgment be granted. No objections were filed but plaintiff filed a document 20 it characterized as a "response" to the report and recommendation in which it asked the court to accept the report and recommendation but also asked that the court find additional grounds for entry of the default judg ment beyond those set forth in the report and recommendation. The court struck this document and granted plaintiff until 9/3/2014 to file a motion with Magistrate Judge Johnston asking him to withdraw the report and recommendation and to seek entr y of a new one if plaintiff so desired. The court stated that if no such motion was filed within the time allowed, the court would accept the report and recommendation 19 on file and enter the default judgment as recommended by Magistrate Judge J ohnston as no timely objection to the report and recommendation had been filed. Plaintiff has not filed such a motion with the magistrate judge. The court has reviewed the record and accepts the report and recommendation. Plaintiffs motion 16 fo r default judgment is granted. Default judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant declaring that plaintiff has no duty to defend defendant in the state court case Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Front Range Environmental et al., Case No. 2013 CV 32289, pending in Jefferson County, Colorado District Court. Mailed notice (ngm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nautilus Insurance Company v. Front Range Environmental , LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Front Range Environmental , LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nautilus Insurance Company
Represented By:	Elissa L. Isaacs
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?