Johal v. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois
3:2020cv50200 |
December 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Rockford Office |
Civil Rights: Education |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons set forth in the attached Opinion, Defendant Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois' motion to dismiss count III 31 is denied, and Defendants Joseph Ross, M.D. and Brett Ruiz's motion to dismiss counts I and II 38 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's individual capacity claims in counts I and II are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's official capacity due process claim in count I is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may proceed on her official capacity equal protection claim in count II and her sex discrimination claim in count III. Any motion for leave to file a second amended complaint shall be filed by 1/11/2021. The telephonic status hearing remains set for 12/30/2020 at 10:15 AM. Signed by the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen on 12/21/2020. Mailed notice (jp, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johal v. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.