Erlandson v. ConocoPhillips Company et al
Plaintiff: James P. Erlandson
Defendant: ConocoPhillips Company and Burlington Resources, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2009cv00099
Filed: February 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: David R Herndon
Presiding Judge: Donald G. Wilkerson
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 84 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Burlington Resources, Inc., ConocoPhillips Company against James P. Erlandson. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 1/3/12. (skp)
December 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER denying plaintiff's 74 motion for summary judgment and granting defendants' 76 motion for summary judgment. The Clerk is ordered to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 12/30/2012. (msdi)
November 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER STAYING CASE, GRANTING 66 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Ruling by Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and to Amend the Scheduling Order filed by Burlington Resources, Inc., ConocoPhillips Company, FINDING AS MOOT 57 MOTION for Extension of Time for Dispositive Motions Deadline filed by Burlington Resources, Inc., ConocoPhillips Company. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 11/10/10. (anj)
October 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER DENYING 59 MOTION for Reconsideration re 58 Order. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 10/21/10. (anj)
September 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER DENYING 47 MOTION Oral Argument re 33 MOTION to Certify Class filed by James P. Erlandson, 33 MOTION to Certify Class filed by James P. Erlandson. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 9/17/10. (anj)
December 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER granting 37 Motion to Supplement. Plaintiff directed to file declaration as a supplemental authority. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 12/30/09. (anj).
December 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER granting 35 Motion to Substitute Documents In Exhibit 2 to Memorandum in Support of Motion for Class Certification re 34 Memorandum in Support of Motion. Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 12/2/09. (anj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Erlandson v. ConocoPhillips Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James P. Erlandson
Represented By: Robert W. Schmieder, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ConocoPhillips Company
Represented By: Ian P. Cooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Burlington Resources, Inc.
Represented By: Ian P. Cooper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?