Andrews v. CBOCS West, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Ruth Noraeen Andrews
Defendant: CBOCS West, Inc. and J. J. Stewart
Case Number: 3:2009cv01025
Filed: December 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Marion
Presiding Judge: Clifford J. Proud
Presiding Judge: William D. Stiehl
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER granting 57 Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of defendant CBOCS West, Inc. and against plaintiff, Ruth Noraeen Andrews. Court DISMISSES with prejudice plaintiff's claims against defendant J.J. Stewart. Signed by Judge William D. Stiehl on 9/26/2012. (jaf)
February 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 34 Plaintiff Ruth Andrews' Motion to Strike: pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c), the Court has reopened limited Discovery for the remedial purposes outlined in the attached Order. As such, Ms. Andrews ' Motion to Strike (Doc. 34 ) is GRANTED in part, as applied to Evelyn Lee and Opal Smith whose Declarations SHALL be STRICKEN from the record (Docs. 32-4 and 32-6). The Motion to Strike is DENIED in part, as applied to Cindy Shields whose Decl aration SHALL stand; and, as it applies to Kenneth Aggers, Mary Crites and Bryan Weaver, the Motion to Strike is DENIED, with the following conditions: Ms. Andrews is given until Friday, April 15, 2011, to Depose Aggers, Crites and Weaver. Ms. Andrews has until Friday, April 22, 2011, to file a Supplemental Response Brief to Cracker Barrels pending Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 27). This Supplemental Response Brief SHALL NOT exceed ten (10) pages in length. Defendant CBOCS West, Inc . (d/b/a Cracker Barrel), may file a Supplemental Reply Brief, on or before Friday, April 29, 2011. Ms. Andrews SHALL bear the costs associated with the deposition of Kenneth Aggers; and, pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 37(c)(1)(A), Cracker Barrel SHALL bear the costs associated with the depositions of Mary Crites and Bryan Weaver. Because of the above-noted deadline extensions, for the purpose of limited additional discovery, the Presumptive Trial Month must be CONTINUED. After coordinating with District Judge Stiehl, the Final Pretrial Conference is hereby RESET for Wednesday, June 1, 2011, at 11:00 a.m., and the Presumptive Trial Month is now July 2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 2/23/2011. (ehb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andrews v. CBOCS West, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ruth Noraeen Andrews
Represented By: D. Eric Sowers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CBOCS West, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. J. Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?