Metro East Black Contractors Organization, Inc. v. Illinois Department of Transportation et al
| Metro East Black Contractors Organization, Inc. |
| Illinois Department of Transportation and Ann Schneider |
| 3:2011cv01041 |
| November 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| St. Clair |
| Philip M. Frazier |
| G. Patrick Murphy |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER denying 7 Motion for Reconsideration brought by Eric Vickers, putative counsel for Plaintiff Metro East Black Contractors Organization, Inc. ("MEBCO"). Vickers is TERMINATED as counsel of record in this case. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of the attached order to Vickers and to remove Vickers from the list of persons authorized to receive notices of electronic filing in this case. The Clerk of Court is directed further to obtain MEBCO's address from Vick ers so that a copy of the attached order can be mailed to MEBCO. MEBCO shall have up to and including February 27, 2012, to secure new counsel in this case; if MEBCO is unable to obtain new counsel by that date, MEBCO may petition the Court for a reasonable extension of time to procure new counsel. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 12/16/2011. (jhs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
