Hatfield v. USA
Rex I. Hatfield |
USA |
3:2012cv01111 |
October 18, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
XX US, Outside State |
David R. Herndon |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 98 ORDER denying (Doc. 93 ) Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Rex I. Hatfield. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 9/27/2021. (arm) |
Filing 91 ORDER denying (Doc. 89 ) Motion to Vacate Judgment. Petitioner's Motion to Vacate Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) is DENIED to the extent that it challenges the integrity of his habeas proceeding and is otherwise DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 8/27/2021. (arm) |
Filing 83 ORDER denying 82 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 1/22/2018. (ceh) |
Filing 75 ORDER denying 60 Motion for Reconsideration/Relief from Judgment ; granting 69 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 11/8/2017. (kmb2) |
Filing 39 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing case with prejudice. Approved by Judge David R. Herndon on 10/8/14. (cekf) |
Filing 38 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Petitioner's motions to amend (Docs. 14 , 15 , 29 , 37 ) are DENIED. Petitioner's motion to appoint counsel (Doc. 19 ) is DENIED. Petitioner's motion for extension of time (Doc. 22 ) is DENIED as MOOT. Pe titioner's discovery motions (Docs. 11 , 25 , 28 , 30 ) are DENIED. Petitioner's motion to correct and amend error (Doc. 34 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner's objection that the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration (Doc. [3 3]) is DENIED. Petitioner's motion for free copy of trial transcripts (Doc. 26 ) is DENIED. Petitioner's motion to stay (Doc. 35 ) is DENIED. Petitioner's motion requesting this Honorable Court Address the Full Contingency Issues Ra ised (Doc. 36 ) is DENIED as MOOT. Finally, petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. The Court shall not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 10/7/2014. (kbl) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying 3 MOTION to join, denying 2 MOTION for Recusal, and directing the government to respond to petitioner's 2255 motion. (The government's response is due by 2/4/2013.). Signed by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 1/3/2013. (msdi) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hatfield v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Rex I. Hatfield | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Represented By: | Robert L. Garrison |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.