Mann v. White et al
| Jason W Mann |
| Jason White, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, C/O Gibbs, Fred, C/O Bloodworth, Greg Randel, Charles Glidewell, Gale Gladson and Thomas Kupferer |
| 3:2014cv00421 |
| April 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Randolph |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
ORDER finding as moot 114 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 115 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 118 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 125 Motion for Summary Judgment. As indicat ed in the attached Order, Defendant Jackson County is DISMISSED with prejudice; the failure to protect claims in Count 2 as against Defendants Fred and Gibbs are DISMISSED with prejudice; and the deliberate indifference claims in Count 4 as against Defendant Bludworth are DISMISSED with prejudice. Count 2 shall go forward as to Defendant Bludworth, and Count 4 shall go forward as to Defendants Fred, Gibbs, and Gladson. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly at the close of the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams on 9/19/2017. (rms2)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. (Action due by 7/14/2014). Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 5/14/2014. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
