Walker v. Harrington et al
Plaintiff: Henry Walker
Defendant: Unknown Parties and Warden
Case Number: 3:2014cv00429
Filed: April 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Kendall
Presiding Judge: J. Phil Gilbert
Presiding Judge: Donald G. Wilkerson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 200 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 176 Motion for Summary Judgment. See Memorandum and Order for details. At the close of the case, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Jeff Hutchinson on all cl aims; enter judgment in favor of Christopher Fleming on all claims; enter judgment in favor of Atchison, Edwards and Harrington on Count I- failure to intervene; enter judgment in favor of Edwards, Ranson and Young on the Count III conditions of con finement claim; enter judgment in favor of all Defendants on Count IV substantive due process (state created danger) claim; enter judgment in favor of Defendants Harrington, Atchison, Edwards, and Fleming on Count VI - the conspiracy claim; enter ju dgment in favor of Harrington, Atchison, Ranson, Young and Fleming on Count V- retaliation claim and against Henry Walker.The remaining claims for trial are: Count I failure to intervene against Ranson and Young; Count II failure to protect agains t Atchison, Edwards, Harrington, Ranson and Young; Count III conditions of confinement against Atchison and Harrington; Count V retaliation against Defendant Edwards; Count VI- conspiracy against Ranson and Young; Count VII Intentional Infliction o f Emotional Distress; Count VII- negligent or willful and wanton conduct; Count IX state law claims of respondeat superior against Atchison and Harrington. The Court REMINDS the parties that this matter is set for settlement conference on April 9, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison on 3/13/2020. (klh)
May 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER DENYING 98 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 5/1/2017. (bak)
May 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to add WARDEN OF MENARD as a party for the sole purpose of assisting with the identification of the John Doe Defendants. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 5/9/2014. (tjk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Harrington et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henry Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?