Hess v. Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University et al
| Nicholas Hess |
| The Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University, Chad Trisler, Katherine L. Sermersheim and Rita Cheng |
| 3:2014cv00727 |
| June 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Williamson |
| Philip M. Frazier |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Plaintiff Nicholas Hess (Hess) has moved for summary judgment on his claims against Defendants, The Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University (SIU), Chad Trisler individually and in his official capacity (Trisler), Katherin Sermersheim, individually (Sermersheim), and Rita Cheng, individually (Cheng) (Defendants, collectively, Defendants). Dkt. No. 31. Defendants have also moved for summary judgment on Hess claims against them. Dkt. No. 32. Previously, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss that remains pending. Dkt. No. 27. For the reasons stated herein, the Court DENIES Hess Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTS Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Larry J McKinney on 12/9/2015. (bgt, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
