Engram-Bey v. Catt et al

Engram-Bey v. Catt et al

Plaintiff:	Ronald Engram-Bey
Case Number:	3:2014cv00904
Filed:	August 18, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office:	East St. Louis Office
County:	Jackson
Presiding Judge:	J. Phil Gilbert
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 3, 2014	Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Furthermore, because Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which has been granted, he will be allotted a STRIKE under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 12/3/2014. (tjk)
September 11, 2014	Filing 8 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that COUNTS 1-5 are all DISMISSED without prejudice; consequently, Defendants ANGELA CATT, DANA TYLKA, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE are all DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before October 3, 2014, Plaintif f shall file an amended complaint, or this action will be dismissed with prejudice and Plaintiff will be assessed a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Any amended complaint must undergo preliminary review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 9/11/2014. (tjk)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 3, 2014

Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Furthermore, because Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which has been granted, he will be allotted a STRIKE under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 12/3/2014. (tjk)

September 11, 2014

Filing 8 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that COUNTS 1-5 are all DISMISSED without prejudice; consequently, Defendants ANGELA CATT, DANA TYLKA, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE are all DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before October 3, 2014, Plaintif f shall file an amended complaint, or this action will be dismissed with prejudice and Plaintiff will be assessed a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Any amended complaint must undergo preliminary review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 9/11/2014. (tjk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Engram-Bey v. Catt et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Engram-Bey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?