Mack v. Quall
Plaintiff: Henry L Mack
Defendant: Officer Quall
Case Number: 3:2014cv00928
Filed: August 25, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Brown
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Reagan
Presiding Judge: Stephen C. Williams
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims designated in the complaint as Claim II and Claim III, which are unrelated to the claims remaining in this action against Defendant Quall, are SEVERED into a new case. See attached order for details. Signed by Judge Michael J. Reagan on 9/16/2014. (tjk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mack v. Quall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Quall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henry L Mack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?