Addison v. Newton et al
Herman Addison, Jr. |
Tracy Newton and Warden Roeckman |
3:2014cv01405 |
December 23, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
East St. Louis Office |
St. Clair |
David R. Herndon |
Stephen C. Williams |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 ORDER, DENYING as unnecessary 61 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability filed by Herman Addison, Jr., GRANTING 63 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Herman Addison, Jr. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 12/21/2015. (dsw) |
Filing 59 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing case with prejudice. Approved by Judge David R. Herndon on 12/2/2015. (cekf) |
Filing 58 ORDER granting 37 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court GRANTS summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Addisons cross motion for summary judgment is DENIED. All remaining motions are DENIED as MOOT. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 11/30/2015. (dsw) |
Filing 9 ORDER denying 7 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 1/29/2015. (dsw) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING 4 MOTION for Service of Process at Government Expense filed by Herman Addison, Jr.; GRANTING 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Herman Addison, Jr.; and DENYING 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Herman Addison, Jr.Signed by Judge David R. Herndon on 1/5/2015. (dsw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.