Staub et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jonathan Staub and Jefferson Finney
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Walgreen Co and CVS Pharmacy Inc
Case Number: 3:2014cv60038
Filed: July 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David R. Herndon
Presiding Judge: Stephen C. Williams
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing case with prejudice. Approved by Chief Judge David R. Herndon on 9/2/14. (cekf)
July 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER - Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, case C14-3040 PSG is transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the Southern District of Illinois with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable David R Herndon. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2014) [Transferred from California Northern on 7/16/2014.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Staub et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Staub
Represented By: Steven D. Davis
Represented By: Eustace DeSaintPhalle
Represented By: Roger C. Denton
Represented By: Michael Edmund Gatto
Represented By: Tor A. Hoerman
Represented By: Seth A. Katz
Represented By: Michael A. London
Represented By: Mark R. Niemeyer
Represented By: William L. Veen
Represented By: Mikal C. Watts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jefferson Finney
Represented By: Steven D. Davis
Represented By: Eustace DeSaintPhalle
Represented By: Roger C. Denton
Represented By: Michael Edmund Gatto
Represented By: Tor A. Hoerman
Represented By: Seth A. Katz
Represented By: Michael A. London
Represented By: Mark R. Niemeyer
Represented By: William L. Veen
Represented By: Mikal C. Watts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Represented By: Dan H. Ball
Represented By: Eric E. Hudson
Represented By: Paul W Schmidt
Represented By: Nicholas Andrew Weiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walgreen Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?