Thomas v. Shah et al
Plaintiff: Farris Thomas
Defendant: Doctor Haymes, Nurse Brooks, John Coe and Mark Hodge
Case Number: 3:2015cv00034
Filed: January 12, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: Lawrence
Presiding Judge: J. Phil Gilbert
Presiding Judge: Donald G. Wilkerson
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER DENYTING 82 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff; GRANTING 84 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Defendant Mark Hodge and against Plaintiff Farris Thomas and to close this case. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/18/2017. (jkb2)
September 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER GRANTING 62 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants David Haymes, Christine Brooks, and John Coe; these Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice from this action. The only remaining claim is Plaintiff's deliberate indifference cl aim against Defendant Hodge. However, Plaintiff is hereby NOTIFIED that the Court is inclined to grant summary judgment to Defendant Hodge pursuant to Rule 56(f). Plaintiff and Hodge are ORDERED to respond and brief the issue of whether summary judgment should (or should not) be granted in favor of Defendant Hodge on or before October 24, 2016. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/26/16. (klh2)
April 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 3 Motion for Recruitment of Counsel; DENYING AS MOOT 23 Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 4/9/15. (sgp)
April 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 4/8/15. (sgp)
February 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/9/2015. (tjk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Shah et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Farris Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doctor Haymes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nurse Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Coe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Hodge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?