USA v. One Taurus PT 24/7 Pro C DS Pistol, bearing serial number TCY480392, and 13 rounds of nine caliber ammunition
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: One Taurus PT 24/7 Pro C DS Pistol, bearing serial number TCY480392, and 13 rounds of nine caliber ammunition
Case Number: 3:2015cv00125
Filed: February 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: East St. Louis Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Philip M. Frazier
Presiding Judge: Nancy J. Rosenstengel
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. One Taurus PT 24/7 Pro C DS Pistol, bearing serial number TCY480392, and 13 rounds of nine caliber ammunition
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: One Taurus PT 24/7 Pro C DS Pistol, bearing serial number TCY480392, and 13 rounds of nine caliber ammunition
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Represented By: Jennifer D.L. Hudson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?