Employers & Cement Masons #90 Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Edwards-Kamadulski, LLC
| Employers & Cement Masons #90 Health & Welfare Fund and Employers & Cement Masons #90 Pension Fund |
| Edwards-Kamadulski, LLC |
| 3:2015cv00179 |
| February 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| J. Phil Gilbert |
| Stephen C. Williams |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1145 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
JUDGMENT- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered for the plaintiffs and against the defendant in the total amount of $3,727.42 that is, $2,651.17 for the outstanding balance under the Consent Decree and $1,076.25 for the plaintiffs' attorney fees. Approved by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 1/12/2021. (jdh)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER GRANTING the plaintiffs' 36 Motion to Enforce/Rule to Show Cause and 45 Motion for Entry of Judgment and DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to ENTER JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 1/12/2021. (cab).
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, granting 8 MOTION for Accounting filed by Employers & Cement Masons #90 Pension Fund, Employers & Cement Masons #90 Health & Welfare Fund. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/8/2016. (jdh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
