Comage v. White et al
| Ronald L Comage |
| S White and J Demond |
| 3:2015cv00536 |
| May 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Randolph |
| Michael J. Reagan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Williams. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 2/16/2016. (tjk)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT, denying without prejudice 3 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel filed by Ronald L Comage, denying as moot 4 MOTION for Service of Process at Government Expense filed by Ronald L Comage. The Complaint (Doc. 1) is DIS MISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendants MONJE, WATSON, BUTLER, LASHBROOK, and GODINEZ are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. Defendant WASHINGTON is DISMISSED from this action wi th prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should he wish to proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint within 35 days of the entry of this order (on or before July 10, 2015). In order to assist Plaintiff in preparing his amended complaint, the Clerk is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a blank civil rights complaint form. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan on 6/5/2015. (beb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
