Diggins v. Coe et al
| Shaquille Ronzell Diggins |
| John Coe, C/O Oche and C/O Gilieath |
| 3:2016cv00242 |
| March 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| East St. Louis Office |
| Lawrence |
| Nancy J. Rosenstengel |
| Donald G. Wilkerson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
153
ORDER DENYING 150 Motion for New Trial filed by Shaquille Ronzell Diggins. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 6/14/2019. (mlp)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 46 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Count 6, along with Wexford and Wexford Doe Defendants 1-20, are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 4/28/2017. (mlp)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER DENYING 35 Motion for Summary Judgment on Issue of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies filed by Defendant John Coe and 39 Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies filed by Defendants Travis Ochs and Michael Gilreath. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 2/7/2017. (mlp)
|
|
Filing
21
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson on 4/18/16. (sgp)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 4/6/2016. (tjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
