Harlow et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
| Rick Harlow, Jon Schoepflin and Myra Lisa Davis |
| Sprint Nextel Corporation and Sprint/United Management Company |
| 2:2008cv02222 |
| May 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Contract: Other Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John W. Lungstrum |
| David J. Waxse |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
394
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER sustaining 392 Motion for Permission to Continue with the Settlement Notice Plan, and Report Regarding Mailing of Settlement Postcards. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall hold a final settlement approval hearing on Monday, December 10, 2018 at 10:30 a.m. . Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 8/14/2018. (as)
|
|
Filing
391
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: 372 Plaintiffs' Motion For Preliminary Approval Of Settlement filed 3/2/2018 and 387 Plaintiffs' Second Supplemental Motion For Preliminary Approval Of Settlement filed 5/21/2018 are SUSTAINED in part. Plaintiffs&# 039; request for a final approval hearing date in 372 Plaintiffs' Motion For Preliminary Approval Of Settlement filed 3/2/2018, para. 5, is OVERRULED as moot in light of plaintiffs' plan to request a final hearing date when they provide t he Court a report on the postcard mailing. 389 Plaintiffs' Motion For Approval Of Adequacy Of Settlement Notice Process filed 5/21/2018 is SUSTAINED. Plaintiffs shall immediately begin the notice plan as described in the Settlement Agreement ( 388 -1) filed 5/21/2018. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 6/4/2018. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
386
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: 372 MOTION for Settlement Preliminary Approval by Plaintiffs. Show Cause Response due by 5/21/2018. The response shall include (1) a revised motion for preliminary approval, (2) a revised settlement agreement or the parties' arguments against revising the agreement and (3) a motion for the Courtto approve the adequacy of the settlement agreement's proposed notice plan. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 5/9/2018. (ydm)
|
|
Filing
325
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 310 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel. Sprint is ordered to (1) produce documents responsive to Plaintiffs' Sixth Request Nos. 52-53 within 30 days of this Memorandum and Order (or the time frame agreed by the parties); (2) forthwith start the process of working cooperatively with Plaintiffs in good faith to reduce the data set size in the NDW and NOR data warehouses; and (3) produce the NDW and NOR data relevant to commissions for Sprint's Business Direct Channel within 90 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order (or the time frame agreed by the parties). Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 11/26/2013. (byk)
|
|
Filing
184
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 171 Defendants' Motion to Compel Responses to Their Second Set of Interrogatories and Second Set of Requests for Production. The Court finds that Second Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 4 have been adequately answered and that the class member completed surveys sought in Second Request No. 4 are protected by the attorney-client privilege. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 2/28/2012. (byk)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 38 SEALED MOTION for Rule 23 Class Certification filed by Rick Harlow. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil for all further proceedings. District Judge John W. Lungstrum no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 12/10/2008.(ses)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 13 Motion to Dismiss as to Count I and denying as moot as to Counts II-V. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 9/2/2008. (ses)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
