Martin v. Group 1 Realty, Inc. et al
| Kenneth J. Martin |
| Group 1 Realty, Inc., Group 1 Automotive, Inc., Baron Automotive Group, Inc. and Baron Development Company, LLC |
| 2:2012cv02214 |
| April 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Jackson |
| Eric F. Melgren |
| David J. Waxse |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 39 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order. Plaintiff's request for a protective order precluding Defendants from serving the proposed four subpoenas on his former employers is den ied. Plaintiff's relevancy objections are sustained in part however. Plaintiff has shown that the subpoenas as proposed are overly broad by seeking specific categories of documents and information that are not relevant to any claim or defense in this case. Defendants may serve the four proposed subpoenas on Plaintiff's former employers, but they shall modify the subpoenas to only request the categories of documents and information allowed by this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 7/1/2013. (byk)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 5 Motion to Dismiss. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 3/18/2013. (cm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
