LaCrosse Furniture Company v. Future Foam, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: LaCrosse Furniture Company
Defendant: Future Foam, Inc., Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Carpenter Company, Carpenter Holdings, Inc., E.R. Carpenter, L.P., Crest Foam Industries, Inc., Flexible Foam Products, Inc., FXI-Foamex Innovations, Inc., Valle Foam Industries (1995) Inc., Vitafoam Products Canada Limited, Vitafoam, Inc., Mohawk Industries, Inc., Leggett & Platt, Inc., Ohio Decorative Products, Inc. and Woodbridge Foam Corporation
Case Number: 2:2012cv02748
Filed: November 29, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Rush
Presiding Judge: James P. O'Hara
Presiding Judge: Kathryn H. Vratil
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 80 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Leggett & Platt, Incorporated's Motion For Leave To File Its Memorandum In Support Of Its Motion For Partial Summary Judgment And Accompanying Documents Under Seal (Doc. #68) filed January 24, 2 017 is OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Leggett & Platt, Incorporated's Motion For Leave To File Its Memorandum In Support Of Its Motion To Exclude Testimony And Expert Reports Of Dr. Orley Ashenfelter Under Seal (Doc. #70) filed January 24 , 2017 is OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff LaCrosse Furniture Co.'s Motion For Leave To File Documents Under Seal (Doc. #73) filed February 8, 2017 is OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff LaCrosse Furniture Co.'s M otion For Leave To File Documents Under Seal (Doc. #75) filed February 14, 2017 is OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Leggett & Platt, Incorporated's Motion For Leave To File Its Reply Memorandum In Support Of Its Motion To Exclude Testimony And Expert Reports Of Dr. Orley Ashenfelter Under Seal (Doc. #77) filed February 21, 2017 is OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Leggett & Platt, Incorporated's Motion For Leave To File Its Reply Memorandum In Support Of Its Motion For Partia l Summary Judgment And Accompanying Documents Under Seal (Doc. #78) filed February 28, 2017 is OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before April 17, 2017, the parties may file the proposed memoranda and exhibits not under seal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against Valle Foam Industries (1995), Inc. are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 4/11/2017. (hl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LaCrosse Furniture Company v. Future Foam, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LaCrosse Furniture Company
Represented By: William D. Beil
Represented By: Brandon J.B. Boulware
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Future Foam, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carpenter Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carpenter Holdings, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E.R. Carpenter, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crest Foam Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Flexible Foam Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FXI-Foamex Innovations, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Valle Foam Industries (1995) Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vitafoam Products Canada Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vitafoam, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mohawk Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leggett & Platt, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ohio Decorative Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Woodbridge Foam Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?