Drury v. BNSF Railway Company

Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff: Michael G. Drury
Case Number: 2:2013cv02282
Filed: June 11, 2013
Court: Kansas District Court
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Johnson
Presiding Judge: J. Thomas Marten
Referring Judge: Gerald L. Rushfelt
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 6, 2015 58 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 47 defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 1/5/15. (mss)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Drury v. BNSF Railway Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Represented By: Jack D. Rowe(Designation Retained)
Represented By: David C. Vogel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael G. Drury
Represented By: Eric W. Smith(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Rik N. Siro(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Athena M. Dickson(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.