McKellips et al v. Kumho Tire U.S.A., Inc. et al
Megan McKellips and Jacob McKellips |
Kumho Tire USA, Inc., Kumho Tire Co., Inc., FDL Corp. and All Star Automotive LLC |
2:2013cv02393 |
August 7, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Kansas City Office |
Miami |
J. Thomas Marten |
David J. Waxse |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 93 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 65 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery. The motion is GRANTED as to RFP 2-13, 18-19, 21-34, 36-41, 43-44, 46-60, 62-79, 81-93, 96-118, Interrogatories 5, 7-9, and 13-16. The motion i s DENIED as to RFP 14-17, 20, 35, 42, 45, 61, 80, 94-95, 119-120, Interrogatories 6 and 10-12. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, Defendant Kumho shall serve amended answers responsive to Plaintiffs' Interrogatorie s 5, 7-9, 13-16, and produce documents responsive to Plaintiffs' RFP 2-13, 18-19, 21-34, 36-41, 43-44, 46-60, 62-79, 81-93, and 96-118, all of which are limited in accordance with the Court's specific objection rulings herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 4/15/2015. (byk) |
Filing 42 ORDER memorializing the Court's rulings made during the 7/16/2014 telephone conference addressing the parties' disputed protective order provisions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 7/17/2014. (byk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.