Trustees of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Health and Welfare Fund of Kansas et al v. American Mechanical, Inc.
| Trustees of the Local 441 Plumbers and Pipefitters Retirement Plan, Trustees of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Retirement Plan of Kansas, Trustees of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Health and Welfare Plan of Kansas and C&J Benefit Solutions, Inc. |
| American Mechanical, Inc. |
| 2:2014cv02023 |
| January 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Sedgwick |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Kathryn H. Vratil |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. The court finds good cause to enter the proposed order submitted by the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 5/5/2014. (ah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Trustees of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Health and Welfare Fund of Kansas et al v. American Mechanical, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Trustees of the Local 441 Plumbers and Pipefitters Retirement Plan | |
| Represented By: | Douglas M. Weems |
| Represented By: | Lucinda Housley Luetkemeyer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Trustees of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Retirement Plan of Kansas | |
| Represented By: | Douglas M. Weems |
| Represented By: | Lucinda Housley Luetkemeyer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Trustees of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Health and Welfare Plan of Kansas | |
| Represented By: | Douglas M. Weems |
| Represented By: | Lucinda Housley Luetkemeyer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: C&J Benefit Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Lucinda Housley Luetkemeyer |
| Represented By: | Douglas M. Weems |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: American Mechanical, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jason P. Lacey |
| Represented By: | Forrest T. Rhodes, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
