Richardson v. Kellogg's et al
| Clydell Richardson |
| Kellogg's and Mary Thomas |
| 2:2014cv02372 |
| July 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Wyandotte |
| Daniel D. Crabtree |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 8 , which the Court converted in part to a motion for summary judgment, is granted. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 2/4/2015. (ms)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Motion to Dismiss Pursuant To F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) by Defendants 8 The Court grants plaintiff leave to amend his Complaint by no later than February 1, 2015. Parties are notified that the Court will treat defendants' ; Motion to Dismiss as a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 only on the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies. Parties may submit any further materials outside the pleadings that they wish to file about the pending is sue of exhaustion of administrative remedies only on or before February 1, 2015. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint for his Title VII claims against defendants by February 1, 2015, the Court will dismiss those claims for failure to state a claim. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 12/22/2014. Mailed to pro se party Clydell Richardson by regular mail. (ms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
