Hayes v. CCS Financial Services Inc.
Plaintiff: Richard W. Hayes
Defendant: CCS Financial Services Inc.
Case Number: 2:2014cv02540
Filed: October 22, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Karen M. Humphreys
Presiding Judge: J. Thomas Marten
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 12 Defendant's motion for leave for its corporate representative to appear telephonically at mediation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Humphreys on 1/30/15. (sj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hayes v. CCS Financial Services Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CCS Financial Services Inc.
Represented By: Rachel B. Ommerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard W. Hayes
Represented By: Bryce B. Bell
Represented By: Ashley Scott Waddell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?