Postley v. Pinnacle Pointe Hospital et al
| Kyomi Postley |
| Pinnacle Pointe Hospital, Scott Carle, Benjamin Nimmo, Kenneth Hawn, Ryan Jones and Garland County Superintendant of Schools |
| 2:2014cv02555 |
| November 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Wyandotte |
| Teresa J. James |
| Julie A. Robinson |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 10 Motion for Reconsideration re 9 Order Dismissing Case, filed by Kyomi Postley. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 4/22/15. Mailed to pro se party Kyomi Postley by regular and certified mail. (Certified Tracking Number: 7002 2030 0000 9348 8688) (kao)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DISMISSING CASE - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that for the reasons set forth in the Court's Order to Show Cause (Doc. 5), this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 2/25/15. Mailed to pro se party Kyomi Postley by regular and certified mail. (Certified Tracking Number: 7012 3460 0000 8262 4265)(kao)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 11/19/2014. Mailed to pro se party Kyomi Postley by certified mail ; Certified Tracking Number: 70123460000082623473. (ts)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
