Choate v. City of Gardner, Kansas et al
Michele Choate |
Gardner, Kansas, City of, Robert Huff, Justin Mohney and Jeff Breneman |
2:2016cv02118 |
February 25, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Kansas City Office |
Johnson |
John W. Lungstrum |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 256 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - granting 251 the Parties' Joint MOTION to Vacate. It is further ordered that 245 Judgment and 250 Amended Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc are hereby vacted. This matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 04/16/2020. (ses) |
Filing 225 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 202 Motion to Exclude Testimony by Brewster Rolland-Keith; granting in part and denying in part 204 Motion to Exclude Testimony by Charles Huth; granting 206 Motion to Exclude Testimony by Jason Latham; and granting in part and denying in part 208 Motion to Exclude Testimony by Various Experts. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 02/18/2020. (ses) |
Filing 177 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 164 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is granted with respect to plaintiff's claim against defendant City based on a failure to provide medical training and plaintiff's claim against the City for punitive damages. The motion is otherwise denied. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 07/12/2018. (ses) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.