Olivares v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al
| Jorge Olivares |
| National Railroad Passenger Corporation, BNSF Railway Company and Cimarron Crossing Feeders, LLC |
| National Railroad Passenger Corporation |
| Cimarron Crossing Feeders, LLC |
| 2:2017cv02397 |
| July 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Carlos Murguia |
| K. Gary Sebelius |
| Federal Employers Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 63 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave of Court to File Second Supplemental and Amended Complaint for Damages. Plaintiff shall electronically file his proposed Second Supplemental and Amended Complaint for Damages within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. It is further ordered that the final Pretrial Conference, previously set for 9/21/2018, is hereby continued to 9/24/2018 at 1:30 PM (central time). Participating counsel must dial 1-888-363-4749 and enter Access Code 4901386 to join the conference. The deadline for submitting the proposed pretrial order is extended to 9/17/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James on 8/24/2018. (byk)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying without prejudice 48 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 4/27/18. (kao)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
