Bowers v. Reece & Nichols Realtors, Inc. et al
| Eric Lee Bowers and Eric Bowers |
| Sandra L Beck, Reece & Nichols Realtors, Inc. d/b/a ReeceNichols, Sandra L. Beck and Reece & Nichols Realtors, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv02094 |
| February 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| James P O'Hara |
| Julie A Robinson |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Eric Bowers upon Sandra L. Beck served on 3/19/2019, answer due 5/13/2019 (Voytas, Richard) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint by Sandra L. Beck.(Brown, Mark) |
| Filing 15 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Reece & Nichols Realtors, Inc. (Berman, Anna) |
Filing 14
INITIAL ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 5/13/2019 at 09:00 AM in KC Courtroom 223 (JPO) before Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara. Report of Parties Planning Meeting deadline 5/3/2019. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 5/3/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 3/19/19. (ss)
|
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Sandra L. Beck. Sandra L. Beck waiver sent on 3/12/2019, answer due 5/13/2019. (Brown, Mark) |
| Filing 12 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Richard A. Voytas, Jr on behalf of Eric Bowers. (Voytas, Richard) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's motion does not state why a seven-week extension is needed. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to #1 plaintiff's complaint by April 12, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 03/13/2019. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jc)
|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Sandra L. Beck (referred to Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara) (Brown, Mark) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Reece & Nichols Realtors, Inc..(Johnson, Eric) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Eric S. Johnson on behalf of Reece & Nichols Realtors, Inc.. (Johnson, Eric) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Anna M. Berman on behalf of Reece & Nichols Realtors, Inc.. (Berman, Anna) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Mark E. Brown on behalf of Sandra L. Beck. (Brown, Mark) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Eric Bowers upon Reece & Nichols Realtors, Inc. served on 2/19/2019, answer due 3/12/2019 (Ross, Nathan) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sandra L. Beck, Reece & Nichols Realtors, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Eric Lee Bowers - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Ross, Nathan) |
| Filing 3 AO FORM 121: REPORT on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright. (Ross, Nathan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Eric Lee Bowers. (Ross, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-4716472.), filed by Eric Lee Bowers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Ross, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
