Grindle v. Cinetopia Prairiefire, LLC
| Daniel L Grindle and Daniel L. Grindle |
| Cinetopia Prairiefire, LLC |
| 2:2020cv02092 |
| February 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kenneth G Gale |
| Kathryn H Vratil |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER overruling #15 Motion for Hearing. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 4/22/2020. (bg)
|
| Filing 23 REPLY to #22 Response to #21 Order, by Plaintiff Daniel L. Grindle. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A, #2 Ex. B, #3 Ex. C, #4 Ex. D)(Brady, James) (Document title modified on 4/15/2020. (mg)) |
| Filing 22 RESPONSE by Defendant Cinetopia Prairiefire, LLC re #21 Order (Warmund, Stephanie) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER. Defendant shall respond to the factual contentions in Plaintiff's Response To Show Cause Order (Doc. #20) by 5:00 P.M. on April 15, 2020. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 4/10/2020. (bg)
|
| Filing 20 RESPONSE re #19 Order to Show Cause,,, Terminate Motions,, by Plaintiff Daniel L. Grindle (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Brady, James) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Doc. #11) filed March 30, 2020 is OVERRULED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff file by 5:00 P.M. on April 9, 2020 a more definite statement of facts which establishes subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's attorneys show cause in writing by 5:00 P.M. on April 9, 2020 why the Court should not sanction plaintiff and his attorneys for violating Rule 11, Fed. R. Civ. P. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 4/3/2020. (hw)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER overruling as moot #6 Cinetopia Prairiefire, L.L.C.'s Motion to Dismiss in light of the filing of #13 First Amended Complaint and #11 Cinetopia Prairiefire, L.L.C.'s Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 4/3/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (as)
|
| Filing 17 RESPONSE by Defendant Cinetopia Prairiefire, LLC re #6 MOTION to Dismiss (Warmund, Stephanie) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER. On or before April 7, 2020 at 5 PM, defendant is to file a response to #15 Plaintiff's Motion For Oral Argument On Defendant's Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Signed by District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 4/2/2020. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(as)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Hearing re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Daniel L. Grindle (Brady, James) |
| MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #15 MOTION for Hearing re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint . The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(df) |
| MOTION REFERRAL to Magistrate Judge REMOVED as to: #15 MOTION for Hearing re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint . The motion will be resolved by the District Judge.(aw) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION by Plaintiff Daniel L. Grindle re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Brady, James) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Defendant Cinetopia Prairiefire, LLC(Warmund, Stephanie) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Defendant Cinetopia Prairiefire, LLC (Warmund, Stephanie) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Due to incorrect party selection during time of filing, DE # 10 has been correctly refiled as docket entry 13 for administrative purposes. (smc) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Cinetopia Prairiefire, LLC, filed by Daniel L. Grindle. (THIS IS A REFILING OF DOCKET ENTRY # 10 FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PURPOSES).(smc) |
| Filing 10 (DISREGARD THIS ENTRY - SEE DE # 13 FOR CORRECT FILING). AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint against Daniel L. Grindle, filed by Daniel L. Grindle.(Brady, James) Modified on 3/30/2020 (smc). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing First Amended Complaint by Daniel L. Grindle re #1 Complaint (attorney) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Brady, James) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Daniel L. Grindle re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Suggestions in Opposition to Defendant Cinetopia Prairiefire, LLC's Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Brady, James) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT of #6 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Cinetopia Prairiefire, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Warmund, Stephanie) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Cinetopia Prairiefire, LLC (Warmund, Stephanie) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Cinetopia Prairiefire, LLC served on 3/4/2020, answer due 3/25/2020. (NOTE: This is a duplicate of #4 , refiled to set the service and answer dates.) (mam) |
| Filing 4 (DISREGARD, see #5 for the corrected filing.) -- RETURN OF SERVICE of Cinetopia Prairiefire, LLC filed by Plaintiff Daniel L. Grindle. (Brady, James) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Daniel L Grindle - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Brady, James) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil and Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately. (ca) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cinetopia Prairiefire, LLC. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (ca) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Daniel L Grindle. (Brady, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $400, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5075471.), filed by Daniel L Grindle.(Brady, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
