Jain et al v. Kumar et al
Plaintiff: Sameer Jain and Upma Jain
Defendant: Kulture Kurry, LLC, Randel Solutions, LLC, Kansas Kurry, LLC, Roushan Kumar and Anjushree Kumar
Case Number: 2:2021cv02126
Filed: March 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Gwynne E Birzer
Referring Judge: Eric F Melgren
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ANSWER to #17 Amended Complaint by Kansas Kurry, LLC, Kulture Kurry, LLC, Anjushree Kumar, Roushan Kumar, Randel Solutions, LLC.(Mecham, Shane)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendants Kansas Kurry, LLC, Kulture Kurry, LLC, Anjushree Kumar, Roushan Kumar, Randel Solutions, LLC (Mecham, Shane)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Sameer Jain and Upma Jain. (refiled for administrative purposes) (mls)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER denying as moot #7 Motion to Dismiss due to Plaintiffs filing an Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 4/27/2021. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (sn)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 RESPONSE by Plaintiffs Sameer Jain, Upma Jain re #7 Motion to Dismiss (Chadwick, Gillian)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 (INCORRECT PARTY SELECTED; DOCUMENT REFILED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PURPOSES - SEE DE #17 FOR CORRECT FILING) AMENDED COMPLAINT against all defendants filed by Sameer Jain and Upma Jain. (Chadwick, Gillian) Modified party names (mls). Modified on 4/30/2021. (kao)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE of Filing First Amended Complaint by Upma Jain re #1 Complaint (attorney) (Chadwick, Gillian)
April 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 6/17/2021 at 01:30 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer. Participants shall dial into the conference call at 888-363-4749, enter access code 9686294#, and follow the prompts to join the call. Report of Parties Planning Conference and Rule 26 Initial Disclosures due 6/10/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 4/14/21. (ala)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kulture Kurry, LLC identifying None as corporate parent . (Mecham, Shane)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kansas Kurry, LLC identifying None as corporate parent . (Mecham, Shane)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Randel Solutions, LLC identifying None as corporate parent . (Mecham, Shane)
April 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Kansas Kurry, LLC, Kulture Kurry, LLC, Anjushree Kumar, Roushan Kumar, Randel Solutions, LLC.(Mecham, Shane)
April 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support by Defendant Anjushree Kumar (Mecham, Shane)
March 16, 2021 Opinion or Order SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kansas Kurry, LLC, Kulture Kurry, LLC, Anjushree Kumar, Roushan Kumar, Randel Solutions, LLC. (issued to Attorney for service) (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (lb)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Dean Robert LeBoeuf for Sameer Jain and Upma Jain pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 83.5.4 for purposes of this case only. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 3/15/21. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ala)
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Dean LeBoeuf re #4 MOTION for attorney Dean LeBoeuf to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5434835.) by Plaintiffs Sameer Jain, Upma Jain(Chadwick, Gillian)
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for attorney Dean LeBoeuf to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5434835.) by Plaintiffs Sameer Jain, Upma Jain (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (Chadwick, Gillian)
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiffs Sameer Jain, Upma Jain - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Chadwick, Gillian)
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiffs Sameer Jain, Upma Jain. (Chadwick, Gillian)
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-5434546.), filed by Sameer Jain, Upma Jain.(Chadwick, Gillian)
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Eric F. Melgren and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (lb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jain et al v. Kumar et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sameer Jain
Represented By: Gillian Chadwick
Represented By: Dean Robert LeBoeuf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Upma Jain
Represented By: Gillian Chadwick
Represented By: Dean Robert LeBoeuf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kulture Kurry, LLC
Represented By: Shane C. Mecham
Represented By: James A. Breckenridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randel Solutions, LLC
Represented By: Shane C. Mecham
Represented By: James A. Breckenridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kansas Kurry, LLC
Represented By: Shane C. Mecham
Represented By: James A. Breckenridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roushan Kumar
Represented By: Shane C. Mecham
Represented By: James A. Breckenridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anjushree Kumar
Represented By: Shane C. Mecham
Represented By: James A. Breckenridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?